9,795
edits
Welcome to the Lylat Wiki, all about the Star Fox series! If you'd like to help out, please take a look at our community portal.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prince Tricky"
From Lylat Wiki, your source on Star Fox information. By Fans, for Fans.
Jump to navigationJump to search
→Article Progression: new section
(→Article Progression: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Well it does contain all the general information on Tricky and is of significant length. The latter half of the ''Adventures'' plot could be expanded, though there isn't a lot of game during the search for the latter two Spellstones. Unless there was something I missed on [[LW:Stubs]].--[[User:TW|TW]] 17:26, 4 September 2010 (PDT) | :Well it does contain all the general information on Tricky and is of significant length. The latter half of the ''Adventures'' plot could be expanded, though there isn't a lot of game during the search for the latter two Spellstones. Unless there was something I missed on [[LW:Stubs]].--[[User:TW|TW]] 17:26, 4 September 2010 (PDT) | ||
::Ah, but is it ready to meet {{LW:DA}}? The details are still being ironed out, but i was thinking an article isn't a stub until it meets Decent-Level Standards. This is Just My Opinion though. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 17:53, 4 September 2010 (PDT). | ::Ah, but is it ready to meet {{LW:DA}}? The details are still being ironed out, but i was thinking an article isn't a stub until it meets Decent-Level Standards. This is Just My Opinion though. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 17:53, 4 September 2010 (PDT). | ||
== Article Progression == | |||
:''The following is text is made under the assumption that the system i propose on {{LW:5STBAFA}} have been approved by the community. If it does not get approved, please disregard.'' | |||
I hereby request an independent reviewer (e.g., someone not heavily involved with the article's development, but may still be interested in article's that focus on Enemies) to test the article under {{LW:Stubs}} standards. If approved, please inform me of the certification. If not approved, please post what is missing and what needs to be improved upon. Thank you for your time, {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 08:29, 5 September 2010 (PDT). | |||
