User talk:A

Hello , and welcome to Lylat Wiki! We're psyched to have you here editing with us, friend! Just a few things to help you get started:

Help guides - To learn how to edit. Welcome - To learn how to navigate, edit and a whole bunch more stuff Areas of the Wiki - A Guide to how the wiki is broken on up. Staff - If there's trouble or you need some help, call one of these guys and gals! What Lylat Wiki is not - To learn what is not allowed on the wiki, and what distinguishes us from other Star Fox wikis. Resources - Some important resources you can use to help us improve articles.

Feel free to ask any staff members if you have questions! Glad to have you with us!

You're Invited!

Sorry, but I don't think I should. The only games on that list that I have played are Super Smash Bros. Melee and Brawl and Star Fox 64, and the last one was through a SSBB demo. A 06:53, 16 August 2010 (PDT)

It's ok. Not a problem. On a related note, if you could help out Template:Tl, Template:Tl and Template:Tl, it would strongly be appreciated. [Tacopill|(talk)] 08:00, 16 August 2010 (PDT).

Okay then. I'll get the Melee and Brawl templates done. A 11:58, 17 August 2010 (PDT)

Sweet, thank you very much! [Tacopill|(talk)] 17:41, 17 August 2010 (PDT).

You're Invited!

I'll join this one I guess. Thanks, A 16:01, 1 September 2010 (PDT)

Cool, thank you. And my limit for inviting people to these things is two. So i will no longer be putting these templates on your discussion page. [Tacopill|(talk)] 16:03, 1 September 2010 (PDT)

Okay then. A 18:34, 1 September 2010 (PDT)

two things!

Hey, got two things for you to check out

1. what do think of the header template here.
2. and what do you think of what i am proposing here. [Tacopill|(talk)] 10:24, 13 September 2010 (PDT).

1. I think it's weird for the sentence to randomly cut off, with the rest only available through the show/hide feature. Other than that, I only see problems with the darkness of the template.
2. The first goal I think can be fulfilled. I only think the last goal is a bit too much. It takes articles time to get FA status. A (B C) 14:12, 14 September 2010 (PDT)

1. Ok. Do you have any suggestions about how i should word it?
2. I actually realized that, and kind of changed my mind to have those numbers to be the goals over the quater (Oct - Dec) see this and this. [Tacopill|(talk)] 14:34, 14 September 2010 (PDT).

1. I just noticed that it was just the placement of the [show] and [hide] that made the sentence do that. I had no problems with the wording. The darkness meant to the colors.
2. I still don't think that could truly be enough time for an article to reach FA status.

To be honest, you really shouldn't be asking my help for this. I'm really only a content adder to articles. A (B C) 15:35, 14 September 2010 (PDT)

1. Ok, i will see if i can fix it.
2. So, 1 article can't reach near-FA-level status by the end of year? I mean, Neo's rules say there a minumn of 3 months that an article needs to wait, so it won't happen anyway. I just want at least one article on the Voting list by 2011.

You are someone i need: an objective-yet-interested contributor who has proven a reliable editor and who's opinion i will value. It is why i ask your opinion, invite you to wiki projects (unless i'm doing a massive invite) and other such actions. [Tacopill|(talk)] 16:55, 14 September 2010 (PDT).

2. It's not so much that it's impossible as it is unlikely. It could take less, but I'm really skeptical on this. Doesn't mean it won't happen. This part might come from the fact that I'm from Bulbapedia, where quality is a really big thing, but the fandom truly is basically just wanting information. A (B C) 17:07, 14 September 2010 (PDT)