Talk:Falco Lombardi

the article has been protected

the article has been protected to allow members of the Stub Level Review Team and the Decent Level Review Team to review the article without it being interrupted. If you wish to change the article, then please post something to the this talk page. [Tacopill|(talk)] 12:55, 11 October 2010 (PDT).

Question

Is this page in the process of being transferred or is it just a pretty bad article? havoC-- 17:29, 26 December 2010 (PST)

Nothing is being transfered that i know of, but i would speak of TW about that, since he's good at it. As for the article quality, what would you recommend we add to improve it? [Tacopill|(talk)] 18:47, 26 December 2010 (PST).

Uh, the info that the Fox article has, for example, should be in this article. Like, game history? havoC-- 19:53, 27 December 2010 (PST)

I currently have no plans for either Falco or Slippy's pages. The only reason I haven't imported them from Arwingpedia is because those pages, while better than some Arwingpedia pages, weren't that great. Of course, I was more critical on them due to the fact that they're character pages. Also, I'd like to keep the character pages the same in terms of style and the Arwingpedia page is extremely different from what we already have.--TW 09:19, 1 January 2011 (PST)

So, how did you form a plan on what do with the Fox Article? and where did you get the information for it? [Tacopill|(talk)] 11:33, 1 January 2011 (PST).

Honestly, I just type it based on what I remember. Star Fox 64 events aren't hard to remember as there aren't many. Star Fox Adventures also has a basic story, so, even though I've only played through twice, I remember 95% of the events. Star Fox: Assault can be played through very quickly and I've played it through many times. Star Fox Command is actually fairly difficult due to the nature of the story. Fortunately, I found this site, which is the script of the game, over at SF-O. --TW 15:32, 2 January 2011 (PST)

If that is so, then my plan may not work well. It also means, i am out of ideas, for the moment, on how to improve the article. [Tacopill|(talk)] 14:02, 5 January 2011 (PST).

Reason

I wanted to put a reason for my rollback, but couldn't. I just thought that it seemed too speculative with all the probablies and such. --TW 12:24, 3 March 2011 (PST)

Everyone

Die Godziller 15:14, 2 February 2012 (PST)

Well, that's not very nice. [Tacopill|(talk)] 17:09, 2 February 2012 (PST).

I was trolling GODZILLER 18:35, 2 February 2012 (PST)

Sorry, but that's not appropriate here. [Tacopill|(talk)] 18:41, 2 February 2012 (PST).