Difference between revisions of "Lylat Wiki talk:Corneria/2010-04-10"

Line 2: Line 2:
What, no judicial? :c Anyway, for the sake of completeness patrollers should be in the Executive (enforcer) branch, as they are similar to police and uphold the law(policy in our case). PureLocke([[User:PureLocke|User]]/[[User talk:PureLocke|Talk]]) 12:42, 11 August 2010 (PDT)
What, no judicial? :c Anyway, for the sake of completeness patrollers should be in the Executive (enforcer) branch, as they are similar to police and uphold the law(policy in our case). PureLocke([[User:PureLocke|User]]/[[User talk:PureLocke|Talk]]) 12:42, 11 August 2010 (PDT)
:I've taken it into consideration, and made changes to my proposal. What do you think? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 13:02, 11 August 2010 (PDT).
:I've taken it into consideration, and made changes to my proposal. What do you think? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 13:02, 11 August 2010 (PDT).
: Looks good, from what I understand a stock patroller like myself would be a level 2, right? If that isn't the case, a guide to each level of bureaucracy/administration would be helpful to users that are new to the wiki system and don't like to search as much as I do are informed of how they can better contribute to this or other wiki. PureLocke([[User:PureLocke|User]]/[[User talk:PureLocke|Talk]]) 15:27, 11 August 2010 (PDT)
75

edits