Vernomian Army Links
I've noticed that one Venomian Army link links here instead of the red link. Is it okay to continue that trend instead of leaving it red linked. I mean this as a temporary solution until we get a page for Venomian Army. --TW 14:22, 30 August 2010 (PDT)
- It's fine with me, so long as the Army has some distinguishably between itself and Andross. [Tacopill|(talk)] 14:26, 30 August 2010 (PDT).
- That was me, since they are only important as Andross' forces and we have no page for the stock invader fighters or other Venomian ships/bioweapons. PureLocke(User/Talk) 14:38, 30 August 2010 (PDT)
- Should we create the respective page(s)? [Tacopill|(talk)] 14:38, 30 August 2010 (PDT).
- My suggestion is that we get all character pages up and running, then planets, next armies, enemies, and lastly the miscellanious (sp?) articles. But that's just my two cents. I think, for now call it Andross's Army and link to Andross. When we get a Venomian Army page, change all Andross's Army to Venomian Army. Any thoughts? --TW 14:54, 30 August 2010 (PDT)
- Works for me. Although i focus more on the Templates, categories, policies, wikiprojects and a few other areas to be of any use to you. If you wish, the people at Template:LW:Characters can help you out (or will be able to, when they join *evil laugh*. [Tacopill|(talk)] 15:27, 30 August 2010 (PDT).
- My suggestion is that we get all character pages up and running, then planets, next armies, enemies, and lastly the miscellanious (sp?) articles. But that's just my two cents. I think, for now call it Andross's Army and link to Andross. When we get a Venomian Army page, change all Andross's Army to Venomian Army. Any thoughts? --TW 14:54, 30 August 2010 (PDT)
- Should we create the respective page(s)? [Tacopill|(talk)] 14:38, 30 August 2010 (PDT).
Name
Is Andross his first or last name? A (B C) 17:11, 24 September 2010 (PDT)