9,793
edits
Difference between revisions of "User talk:A"
→two things!
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:::#I still don't think that could truly be enough time for an article to reach FA status. | :::#I still don't think that could truly be enough time for an article to reach FA status. | ||
:::To be honest, you really shouldn't be asking my help for this. I'm really only a content adder to articles. [[User:A|A]] ([[User talk:A|B]] [[special:Contributions/A|C]]) 15:35, 14 September 2010 (PDT) | :::To be honest, you really shouldn't be asking my help for this. I'm really only a content adder to articles. [[User:A|A]] ([[User talk:A|B]] [[special:Contributions/A|C]]) 15:35, 14 September 2010 (PDT) | ||
::::# Ok, i will see if i can fix it. | |||
::::#So, 1 article can't reach near-FA-level status by the end of year? I mean, [[User:Neo|Neo]]'s rules say there a minumn of 3 months that an article needs to wait, so it won't happen anyway. I just want at least one article on the Voting list by 2011. | ::::#So, 1 article can't reach near-FA-level status by the end of year? I mean, [[User:Neo|Neo]]'s rules say there a minumn of 3 months that an article needs to wait, so it won't happen anyway. I just want at least one article on the Voting list by 2011. | ||
:::: You are someone i need: an objective-yet-interested contributor who has proven a reliable editor and who's opinion i will value. It is why i ask your opinion, invite you to wiki projects (unless i'm doing a massive invite) and other such actions. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 16:55, 14 September 2010 (PDT). | :::: You are someone i need: an objective-yet-interested contributor who has proven a reliable editor and who's opinion i will value. It is why i ask your opinion, invite you to wiki projects (unless i'm doing a massive invite) and other such actions. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 16:55, 14 September 2010 (PDT). | ||