123
edits
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Moydow"
→two things!
(→two things!: new section) |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
# what do think of the header template [[Talk:Fox_McCloud|here]]. | # what do think of the header template [[Talk:Fox_McCloud|here]]. | ||
# and what do you think of what i am proposing [[Lylat_Wiki:Corneria/2010-09-13#Article_Evaluation|here]]. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 10:20, 13 September 2010 (PDT). | # and what do you think of what i am proposing [[Lylat_Wiki:Corneria/2010-09-13#Article_Evaluation|here]]. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 10:20, 13 September 2010 (PDT). | ||
:# I've never seen anything like this before, outside of StrategyWiki, where it's used for a very different purpose. I'm not sure what to think of it on a regular wiki. Perhaps just try it out and see what the general opinion is. | |||
:# It's always a good idea to have an independent review of an article. On StrategyWiki, the ystem is to allow a guide's contributors decide its completion level (between levels 1 and 4). Featured guides (level 5) are voted on by the community, and it's often the only point where a guide gets a good thorough review by others. So I'd be favourable to the system you propose. A good idea is to get reviews from increasingly external sources as a page gets closer to featured status. If you'd like, I could help with some of the reviewing, as most of what I do focuses on reviewing edits for quality, and generally keeping pages in order. | |||
: [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 13:42, 13 September 2010 (PDT) | |||