Difference between revisions of "User talk:A"

401 bytes added ,  00:07, 15 September 2010
m
Line 31: Line 31:
::::#So, 1 article can't reach near-FA-level status by the end of year? I mean, [[User:Neo|Neo]]'s rules say there a minumn of 3 months that an article needs to wait, so it won't happen anyway. I just want at least one article on the Voting list by 2011.  
::::#So, 1 article can't reach near-FA-level status by the end of year? I mean, [[User:Neo|Neo]]'s rules say there a minumn of 3 months that an article needs to wait, so it won't happen anyway. I just want at least one article on the Voting list by 2011.  
:::: You are someone i need: an objective-yet-interested contributor who has proven a reliable editor and who's opinion i will value. It is why i ask your opinion, invite you to wiki projects (unless i'm doing a massive invite) and other such actions. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 16:55, 14 September 2010 (PDT).
:::: You are someone i need: an objective-yet-interested contributor who has proven a reliable editor and who's opinion i will value. It is why i ask your opinion, invite you to wiki projects (unless i'm doing a massive invite) and other such actions. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 16:55, 14 September 2010 (PDT).
:::::2. It's not so much that it's impossible as it is unlikely. It could take less, but I'm really skeptical on this. Doesn't mean it won't happen. This part might come from the fact that I'm from Bulbapedia, where quality is a really big thing, but the fandom truly is basically just wanting information. [[User:A|A]] ([[User talk:A|B]] [[special:Contributions/A|C]]) 17:07, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
48

edits