9,793
edits
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Wii"
→This template is pointless
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Wii can have other templates, and it's not like it's a living creature and will be upset. This template doesn't need to be used, instead you can just type <nowiki>[[Wii]]</nowiki> which prevents the use of a template, means that we don't need an extra page for a template and it avoids template transclusion. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|SnorlaxMonster]] 00:27, 25 October 2010 (PDT) | ::Wii can have other templates, and it's not like it's a living creature and will be upset. This template doesn't need to be used, instead you can just type <nowiki>[[Wii]]</nowiki> which prevents the use of a template, means that we don't need an extra page for a template and it avoids template transclusion. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|SnorlaxMonster]] 00:27, 25 October 2010 (PDT) | ||
:::What's wrong with template tranclusion? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 08:43, 25 October 2010 (PDT). | :::What's wrong with template tranclusion? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 08:43, 25 October 2010 (PDT). | ||
::::Well, eventually if you start putting templates in templates in templates, you might hit the template limit (like what happened over at Bulbapedia in some pages with lots of Trainers). Also, it is less confusing to newer users who are looking at new articles, and see that using curly braces links articles. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 23:56, 26 October 2010 (PDT) | |||
:::::I suppose.....ok. I will work on removing it. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 09:06, 27 October 2010 (PDT). | |||