Difference between revisions of "Talk:Star Fox 2"
Active discussions
m (moved Talk:Star Fox 2 (Game) to Talk:Star Fox 2) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Where should we put this game? == | == Where should we put this game? == | ||
Being it was never released, should this game go under "snes", or "other"? [[User: | Being it was never released, should this game go under "snes", or "other"? [[User:Tacopill|Tacopill]] 17:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:It was an SNES game, as is proved through the ROMs which exist today. It just needs to be denoted that it's an unreleased game.[[User:Neo|Neo]] 22:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | :It was an SNES game, as is proved through the ROMs which exist today. It just needs to be denoted that it's an unreleased game.[[User:Neo|Neo]] 22:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Got 3 thoughst on this: | ::Got 3 thoughst on this: | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::#With the deletion of my games template, the original reason i posted this is now moot, as i was wondering where in the template to place it under. Hm..... | ::#With the deletion of my games template, the original reason i posted this is now moot, as i was wondering where in the template to place it under. Hm..... | ||
::#Being it was unrelaesed, should it go in the [[Star Fox (Series) | Series chronology]]? | ::#Being it was unrelaesed, should it go in the [[Star Fox (Series) | Series chronology]]? | ||
::[[User: | ::[[User:Tacopill|Tacopill]] 17:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Well, it wasn't deleted. I just deleted the meta-templates. It does deserve to go in there, in my opinion. And it definitely deserves a mention in chronology. It's not canon, but it exists.[[User:Neo|Neo]] 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | :::Well, it wasn't deleted. I just deleted the meta-templates. It does deserve to go in there, in my opinion. And it definitely deserves a mention in chronology. It's not canon, but it exists.[[User:Neo|Neo]] 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:46, 21 August 2010
Where should we put this game?
Being it was never released, should this game go under "snes", or "other"? Tacopill 17:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- It was an SNES game, as is proved through the ROMs which exist today. It just needs to be denoted that it's an unreleased game.Neo 22:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Got 3 thoughst on this:
- Hm... i'm unsure if i would consider ROM's as "official", as they can be made-up. Anyway, this maybe something, if possible, to be backed by citations.
- With the deletion of my games template, the original reason i posted this is now moot, as i was wondering where in the template to place it under. Hm.....
- Being it was unrelaesed, should it go in the Series chronology?
- Tacopill 17:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it wasn't deleted. I just deleted the meta-templates. It does deserve to go in there, in my opinion. And it definitely deserves a mention in chronology. It's not canon, but it exists.Neo 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Got 3 thoughst on this: